The chapter on electricity generation is composed of two main parts. The first covers
the installed capacity, with values expressed in MW and GW, while the second covers
the generation mix, i.e., energy expressed in TWh, in this case per year. The second
part also presents the projected situation. of the Mediterranean Power System using
other indicators, for example annual CO
2
emissions, the average marginal price or the
balance of electricity exchanges between countries.
In order to provide a perspective of these results, the presentation of the three
scenarios for 2030 is complemented with values for the year 2020, which serves as an
historical reference.
5.1 Installed capacity
Total installed capacity
Figure 5-1. Total installed capacity in the Mediterranean countries by fuel (2020 historical data and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
The three scenarios show the rapid continuation of the coal and lignite power plant
phase-out by 2030, with a particular acceleration in shutdowns in several Mediterranean
countries in South-Eastern Europe. The generation capacity of gas-fired power plants
remains generally constant, a trend which corresponds to a reduction in capacity in
most European countries of the Mediterranean, while the trend is the opposite in the
MENA countries, particularly in the Mediterranean Ambition scenario.
The evolution of the nuclear capacity is a constant global trend, even showing an
increase (+ 11 GW) in the Mediterranean Ambition scenario, in which the capacity
in Europe is maintained while a significant development is noted in certain MENA
countries (Türkiye and Egypt).
A brief overview of the total installed capacity for the three scenarios compared with
2020 historical data in all Mediterranean countries is shown below.
Figure 5-2. Total installed capacity by country (2020 historical data and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
Figure 5-3. Installed capacity by regional groups (2020 Historical Data and Med TSO 2030 Scenarios)
Figure 5-2 shows that Northern countries (Spain, France, Italy, and Portugal) have higher
installed capacity for the PR than for the MA scenario, due to the high potential of RES
development. The lower increase in the MA scenario installed capacity is due to the
stabilized demand and energy efficiency. Southern countries (Egypt, Jordan, Morocco)
and Türkiye demonstrate the opposite situation, i.e. a higher increase in installed capacity
in the MA scenario compared to the PR scenario , which means that the efforts made by
improving energy efficiency are more than covered by higher economic growth and the
ambition to export RES Energy
This aspect is clearly seen in
Figure 5-3 , which represents the breakdown of total
installed capacity for each scenario by Mediterranean regional grouping.
Additionally, the percentage shares of each Mediterranean regional group for all the
scenarios (and 2020 historical data) are shown in
Figure 5-4 .
Figure 5-4. Percentage share of installed capacity by regional groups (2020 historical data and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
Although the North-West countries keep the higher share of installed capacity in the
three scenarios, it is noticeable from
Figure 5-4 that their percentage share is practically
the same across different scenarios.
Figure 5-5 presents a detailed overview of the installed capacity for the three scenarios
and the historical year 2020 by generation technology for all the Mediterranean
regional groups.
Figure 5-5. Regional groups' installed capacity by technology (2020 and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
For the North-West countries, in the 2030 scenarios, there is no use of coal, lignite and
oil, as opposed to what can be observed in 2020. Conversely, in these countries, there is a
noticeable increase in the RES share, which represents around 70% in the three scenarios,
as opposed to 50% in 2020. The nuclear power plants are mainly found in this region,
whose installed capacity sees a slight decrease, like that which is observed for gas.
North-East countries invest more in nuclear power plants (Türkiye) and decrease their
capacity in oil and lignite plants. Additionally, they continue to promote RES integration
(from 55% in 2020 to a max of 70% in 2030 in the PR and MA scenarios).
The gas power plants are the main technology in the South-West and the South-East
regions among the three scenarios. In the South-West countries, almost the entirety
of oil capacity is decommissioned in the three scenarios. Meanwhile, some South-East
countries expect investments in oil-shale power plants.
The RES capacity increases significantly in the southern region, mainly driven by the sharpest
PV cost decline over the past decade, combined with good to excellent natural resources.
Figure 5-6 shows an overview on the percentage share of total installed capacity by
generation technology for the Mediterranean countries in 2020 and in the 2030 scenarios.
The values for the installed capacity in GW can be found in Appendix 7.1.
Figure 5-6. Installed capacity by fuel in 2020 & 2030 scenarios (Mediterranean countries)
In comparison with 2020, by 2030, a large proportion of the oil capacity will decrease,
especially in Albania, Cyprus, and Croatia, being replaced by gas. Alternatively, some
countries invest in oil, as is the case of Malta and Jordan (oil-shale).
Investments in nuclear generation are foreseen in Egypt and Türkiye in the three
scenarios.
In the 2030 time-horizon, Spain and Italy show a full decommissioning in coal, lignite and
oil capacity. Tunisia increases its capacity of RES compared to 2020, by increasing the
share of wind, solar but also hydro storage in its total installed capacity, while Albania,
Portugal and Croatia present the highest integration of renewable energy. Compared
to 2020, Morocco decreases its share in oil and coal in the three scenarios, while Italy
decommissions all its oil capacity and significantly increases its RES capacity share.
5.1.1 Installed RES capacity
Figure 5-7 shows a significant and swift increase in solar development by scenario. Such
projected evolution is based on the sharp PV cost decline that has already been seen in
the past decade, combined with the high available potential in Mediterranean countries.
The PR scenario foresees a value of almost six times that observed in 2020.
Figure 5-7. Hydro, wind and solar capacity in Mediterranean countries (2020 Historical data and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
With regards to wind capacity, the projected development in the three scenarios is less
expressive than that of solar. This is primarily explained by the capital cost associated with
wind projects, which is relatively higher than solar projects, but also in several countries
by the advanced maturity of wind industry relative to a saturation of the onshore potential.
Nevertheless, the projected increase in wind power is significant, especially in the PR scenario,
with values in 2030 reaching almost three times the installed capacity observed in 2020.
Figure 5-8. Total RES installed capacity by Mediterranean regional group (2020 and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
As for the hydro installed capacity, it is worth mentioning that the presented figures show a
combination of hydro pump storage projects and new dam projects. The growth projected
in hydro development is much more limited when compared to solar and even to wind
power. The projected growth for hydro is similar in the three scenarios.
The
Figure 5.8 shows the breakdown of RES installed capacity for each scenario across
the Mediterranean regional groups.
Similar to what is observed for the total installed capacity,
Figure 5-8
shows that the development of RES (hydro, wind, solar and other RES capacity) increases from the
Inertial scenario to the Mediterranean Ambition scenario for South-West, North-East &
South-East countries, while in the North-West countries, the Proactive scenario presents
the highest installed RES capacity. It is also very clear that North-West countries present
the highest installed RES capacity in all scenarios.
Figure 5-9. Percentage of total installed RES capacity by regional groups (2020 and 2030 Med-TSO scenarios)
Figure 5-9 shows a detailed percentage share of total installed RES capacity by
Mediterranean regional groups for 2020 and for the Med-TSO 2030 scenarios.
Despite the projected overall significance of the North-West countries in terms of the
total RES installed capacity, there is a projected decrease in its percentage of total RES
over the three scenarios.
Much of the installed RES capacity (in terms of GW) is concentrated on the North coast,
especially in Spain, France and Italy for solar and wind, while hydro is mostly concentrated
in Türkiye, Italy and France.
An overview of the Wind and Solar Atlas is presented in the following figures, followed
by a detailed map that shows the development of hydro, wind, and solar projects against
the total installed capacity for each scenario. The Atlas Map provides a clear view on the
existing RES potential in the Mediterranean Region.
Figure 5-10. Mediterranean Solar Atlas 2 (
Source )
Figure 5-11. Mediterranean Wind Atlas mean Power Density (
Source )
Although the highest hydro installed capacity (in GW) for the 2030 time-horizon is
expected to be in Türkiye, Italy and France, the highest hydro installed capacity ratio as
a percentage of the total installed capacity is found in Albania, Montenegro and Croatia,
in all scenarios. As part of its efforts to develop RES and to deal with flexibility issues,
Tunisia is planning to start investment in hydro pumping storage, while other countries
are expected to continue increasing their hydro installed capacity ratio.
While the trend of RES integration in most of the countries presents a significant increase
in the three scenarios, Algeria, Libya, Montenegro and Malta see a more significant
integration of wind technology in the PR and MA scenarios. All the other countries are
expected to enhance their wind integration, as is clear in the cases of Spain and Portugal.
For solar generation, the scenarios show a new promotion of solar generation in Tunisia,
Libya, Egypt and Algeria, while Malta, Slovenia, Spain and Italy are expected to continue
reinforcing their capacity compared to 2020.
Figure 5-15. RES technology and shared percentage of total
installed capacity (2020 and 2030 Med-TSO scenarios)
Figure 5-15 shows the breakdown of RES technologies, the RES total installed capacity
and its percentage against total installed capacity for each scenario. We can see that the
total installed capacity is projected to increase by 1.3 to 1.7 times its 2020 value, while
the RES is projected to increase by 1.4 to 1.6 times the value observed in 2020. Under the
three projected scenarios, the integration of renewable capacity is around 67%, vs 42%
in 2020, with solar taking the highest share (around 32%).
Considering the RES penetration by country in the projected scenarios, the highest share
is 93%, observable in Albania in the Inertial scenario. As the target for RES integration of
many countries is expressed in terms of installed capacity and not in terms of generation,
Table 5-1 shows the ratio of RES installed capacity as a percentage of total installed
capacity for each country.
Historical Data 2020
96%
56%
21%
2%
10%
57%
41%
54%
68%
14%
48%
34%
Inertial
92%
64%
37%
14%
31%
79%
62%
71%
85%
39%
69%
47%
Proactive
93%
79%
48%
22%
36%
85%
69%
81%
91%
48%
76%
47%
Mediterranean Ambition
93%
81%
46%
22%
38%
79%
68%
80%
88%
44%
75%
43%
Historical Data 2020
12%
0%
37%
79%
33%
42%
69%
43%
14%
6%
51%
Inertial
26%
13%
62%
87%
35%
55%
88%
64%
31%
32%
69%
Proactive
37%
20%
67%
92%
48%
58%
91%
70%
41%
40%
60%
Mediterranean Ambition
35%
20%
67%
90%
46%
62%
90%
58%
28%
39%
61%
Table 5-1. RES integration in terms of installed capacity
Albania, Croatia, Montenegro, Portugal and Spain are among the countries in which the
projected RES integration is greatest.
5.2 Generation mix
Figure 5-16 shows the generation mix (annual energy, in TWh) by scenario and by
generation type for the whole Mediterranean Region compared with 2020 historical data.
There is a projected increase of 27%, 47% and 46% in yearly generation, respectively
in the IN, PR & MA scenarios when compared to the 2020 figure. A massive increase in
solar, wind, and other renewable generation is envisaged. On the contrary, a decrease in
oil, nuclear and coal is projected for the three scenarios. According to Med-TSO’s three
scenarios, gas and lignite generation see a slight global increase.
Figure 5-16. Energy generation in the Mediterranean countries by fuel type
(2020 historical data and Med- TSO 2030 scenarios)
Figure 5-17. Total energy generation by country
(2020 historical data and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
Similarly, to what was observed for the installed capacity, Northern countries (Spain,
Italy and Portugal) show a higher generation in the PR scenario than in the MA scenario,
due to the high potential RES development in the PR scenario and to the lower demand
in the MA scenario, partially explained by the higher impact of energy efficiency
measures. Southern and Eastern countries such as Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, and Syria,
show different projected figures, generally with greater generation in the PR scenario
compared to the Inertial scenario, and with greater generation in the MA scenario
compared to the PR scenario.
This aspect is more evident in
Figure 5-18 , which represents the breakdown of total
generation for each scenario across the Mediterranean grouping.
Figure 5-18. Energy generation by regional groups
(2020 historical data and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
Additionally, the percentage shares of each Mediterranean regional group for all the scenarios (and 2020 historical data) are shown in
Figure 5-19 .
Figure 5-19. Percentage share of energy generation
by regional group (2020 historical data and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
Figure 5-19 shows that the percentage share of total generation in South-West, NorthEast and South-East countries increases in the projected 2030 figures compared to
2020, which can be explained by the higher growth in demand in those regions, which in
turn can be explained by higher expected economic and population growth, compared to
the North-West countries. In fact, the generation share of the North-West decreases from
55% in 2020 to 49% in the Inertial scenarios and 50% in PR and MA scenarios in 2030. A
substantial part of that generation mix is associated with RES generation, which will be
discussed in further detail in Section 5.2.1
Figure 5-20 presents an overview on the generation technology breakdown observable in
2020 and in the three Med-TSO 2030 scenarios for all the Mediterranean regional groups.
These detailed breakdowns show that the North-West countries are abandoning the
use of coal, lignite and oil generation and are decreasing gas generation by almost half,
alternatively recurring to other non-renewable technologies and mostly to RES, which
see a projected increase from 34% to 56%, 69% & 66% in the Inertial, PR and MA scenarios
respectively. As in the installed capacity, nuclear generation is significant in this group,
but foresees a decrease of 20%.
Figure 5-20. Mediterranean regional groups' energy generation by technology
(2020 and 2030 Med-TSO scenarios)
In the case of the South-West group countries, the Med-TSO scenarios consider the
possibility of abandoning the usage of oil, with most of the generation being ensured by
gas (73% on average for the three scenarios). According to these scenarios, the share of
coal generation is divided by two to three when the RES share increases from 5% in 2020
to 20%, 24% & 27% in the Inertial, PR and MA scenarios, respectively.
Concerning the North-East group countries, they show a very diversified generation
mix. According to the Med-TSO scenarios, these countries should abandon the use of
oil, and massively reduce the share of coal and lignite from 30% in 2020 to 8-15%, while
increasing usage of gas and nuclear. The RES ratio is anticipated to increase from 43%
to around 57%.
Finally, for the South-East group countries, the Med-TSO scenarios also foresee a huge
reduction in oil generation, while a small decrease in gas by 13% in the PR scenario.
Figure 5-21 shows an overview of the percentage share of total generation mix by
technology for the Mediterranean countries in 2020 and in the 2030 scenarios. Detailed
energy generation in TWh can be found in Appendix 7.2.
Compared to 2020, there is a significant expected reduction in nuclear generation in
Spain & Slovenia in the 2030 Med-TSO scenarios. Conversely, there is new nuclear
generation in Egypt & Türkiye.
As for lignite, the projected scenarios foresee decommissioning in Greece and Montenegro
(compared to 2020 figures).
In gas generation, according to Med-TSO scenarios there is an expected significant
increase in Cyprus, Israel, Lebanon and Syria, and a notable decrease in the rest of the
countries.
Finally, concerning wind and solar, an overall increase in the penetration of these
technologies is present in the projected generation of the three scenarios.
5.2.1 RES generation
Figure 5-22 shows the wind, solar and hydro penetration per scenario, compared to the
historical values observed in 2020.
The PR scenario comprehends the highest solar penetration, which is almost six times
the generation recorded in 2020.
Figure 5-22. Hydro, wind, and & solar generation in Mediterranean countries
(2020 historical data and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
Figure 5-23. Total RES generation by Mediterranean
regional group (2020 and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
As seen in the previous chapters, the foreseen installed wind capacity in the 2030 timehorizon is as large as the solar capacity. However, in terms of generated energy, expected
wind penetration is much higher than that of solar in all the scenarios, as a result of the
higher capacity factor ratio associated with wind technology.
As for the hydro penetration, the three scenarios show a similar expected level of
generation in 2030, with the MA scenario representing the highest penetration, due to
new projects set to be implemented in Türkiye.
Figure 5-23 shows the breakdown of RES generation for each scenario across
Mediterranean regional groups.
Figure 5-24 shows that the projected scenarios contemplate a very significant increase in
RES penetration across all the Mediterranean groups. While the increase in South-West,
North-East and South-East is consecutive across the IN, PR and MA scenarios, the NorthWest group flows a different pattern due to stabilized demand. The following Figures
show the detailed percentage share of total RES generation in each Mediterranean
regional group.
Figure 5-24. Percentage of total RES generation by
regional groups (2020 and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
The North-West group is expected to be the highest contributor to RES generation.
However, we can also observe a huge development in North-East & South-East groups,
which leads to an expected reduction of the percentage share of the South-West group
from 30% in 2020 to 21%-24% in 2030, according to the scenario. The following block
diagram gives an overview of the penetration of hydro, wind, and solar projects in each
country in 2020 and in the Med-TSO 2030 scenarios.
In 2020, 99% of the generation mix in Albania was based on hydro, while in 2030, Albania
is expected to diversify its mix and, according to the project scenarios, decrease its share
of hydro generation to 82%, 76% and 75% (for the IN, PR, MA scenarios respectively).
Wind penetration is mainly concentrated in the North & South-West countries, especially
in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Spain and Portugal, and all scenarios forecast a
significant increase. Almost 40% of the generation in Morocco & Portugal is expected to
be provided by wind.
It is also clear that all the countries are expected to develop solar, and consequently
there is an improvement in their solar generation in the three scenarios compared to
2020. According to the Med-TSO 2030 scenarios, the highest solar penetration would be
in Cyprus, Spain, Portugal, Italy, and Greece, and reaches up to 40% in the PR scenario.
Figure 5-28. Total RES source and shared percentage of
total demand (2020 historical data and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
Figure 5-28 shows the overall RES technology, RES penetration and its percentage against
total demand per scenario. We can observe that in these scenarios, demand increases by
1.3 to 1.5 times what it was in 2020, while RES penetration increases by 1.5 to 1.86 times.
Solar and wind penetration increases significantly from 4% to 19% and from 9% to 23%
respectively in the PR scenario, while the hydro ratio decreases by around 3% compared
to 2020.
According to these scenarios, for the whole Mediterranean Region, the integration of
renewables could be around 55% in the PR scenario and 45% in the Inertial and MA
scenarios, vs 29% in 2020. The percentage of RES penetration for all Mediterranean
countries for the reference year 2020 and for the three projected scenarios for the year
2030 is presented in
Table 5-2 . The RES penetration percentage is the total RES generation
divided by the total load, expressed in %.
A comparison of the data from 2020 with the three potential scenarios incorporated anticipated
efforts to increase the RES penetration in all Mediterranean countries in all scenarios. The
PR scenario clearly has the highest percentages of RES penetration in practically all cases.
Some countries have a RES penetration reaching 100% (i.e., Montenegro).
Historical Data 2020
100%
29%
12%
1%
12%
44%
24%
42%
66%
6%
36%
15%
Inertial
92%
88%
34%
7%
24%
75%
41%
51%
86%
25%
57%
27%
Proactive
95%
92%
52%
12%
29%
91%
51%
74%
89%
35%
70%
28%
Mediterranean Ambition
93%
94%
45%
12%
32%
78%
51%
72%
87%
32%
71%
24%
Historical Data 2020
3%
0%
19%
52%
12%
22%
58%
33%
5%
4%
43%
Inertial
11%
8%
60%
100%
23%
34%
82%
49%
22%
29%
44%
Proactive
19%
12%
64%
100%
52%
36%
91%
51%
30%
48%
33%
Mediterranean Ambition
16%
12%
73%
100%
46%
37%
85%
33%
20%
50%
33%
Table 5-2. Percentage of RES penetration in all Mediterranean countries
5.3 CO2 emissions
Figure 5-29 depicts the direct annual CO
2
emissions (in Mtons by year) from electricity
generation and the average CO
2 content of electricity generation (in gCO
2
/kWh) per scenario. It is evident that the three scenarios foresee a reduction of the annual CO
2
emission compared to the estimation (the direct CO
2 emission estimation for 2020 assumes the following emission factors (gCO
2
/kWh) from fossil-fuelled electricity generation: coal 900, lignite 1200, gas 400, oil 700, and other nonrenewables 500.) for 2020 by roughly 19%. For the average CO
2
content of electricity generation, a similar percentage reduction is foreseen when
compared to the 2020 values, ranging from 36% to 50%, depending on the scenario.
Figure 5-29. CO2
emission & content of electricity
generation (G CO2
/Kwh) (estimated 2020 and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
The embedded effort of each Mediterranean regional group to reduce annual CO
2
emissions in the three scenarios, can be seen in
Figure 5 30 . This shows that the NorthWest group is expected to massively reduce its annual CO
2
emission by 47%, 59% & 63% in
the Inertial, PR & MA scenarios respectively. The South-West group could see an increase
in annual CO
2
emissions in all scenarios, because of a prevailing dependency on fossil
fuel generation. The North-East is expected to reduce its annual CO
2
emissions by 15% to
32%. The South-East group countries anticipate a decrease in the PR scenario, while the
Inertial and MA scenarios show values that are in line with what was observed in 2020.
The effort by each Mediterranean regional group to reduce the average CO
2
content of electricity generation (in gCO
2 /kWh), associated with the three scenarios, is shown in
Figure 5-31 . It is noticeable that, according to these scenarios, the North-West countries
expect to massively decrease the CO
2 content of their generation by around two thirds
(55%, 71% & 74% in the Inertial, PR and MA scenarios respectively). The rest of the
groups (South-West, North-East & South-East) anticipate a reduction ranging from 28%
to 44% in the different scenarios, due to the ambitious targets of RES integration for the
North-West countries.
Figure 5-30. CO2 emission by regional groups (estimated 2020 and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
Figure 5-31. Average CO2 content of electricity generation (gCO2 /Kwh)
by regional groups (estimated 2020 and Med-TSO 2030 scenarios)
Figure 5-32 shows the annual CO
2
emission per country in 2030. According to the MedTSO 2030 Scenarios, the highest annual CO
2
emission in Mtons among the Mediterranean
countries is anticipated in TR, due to the significant use of gas, coal and lignite in the
generation mix foreseen in the 2030 time-horizon.
While the graph of total CO
2 emissions shows broad dispersion, this is not the case for
the expected average CO
2 content of electricity generation. In fact, most Mediterranean
countries expect an average CO
2 content of electricity generation of between 0 and 371
gCO
2 /kWh. In contrast, seven countries (Albania, Spain, France, Croatia, Montenegro,
Bosnia Herzegovina and Portugal) present an expected value of CO
2
content of less than 58 gCO
2 /kWh by 2030, as shown in
Figure 5-33 .
5.4 Average marginal generation price per country
This chapter presents the outlook for the Mediterranean electricity system from the
perspective of an indicator obtained from the simulations. This is the annual average
marginal price per country.
The average marginal price constitutes an interesting indicator insofar as on one hand,
it results from the competitiveness of the national generation fleets and the supplydemand balance, and on the other, it constitutes an indicative parameter of the electricity
exchanges between countries, as a direct consequence of economic optimizations.
Figure 5-34 presents the average marginal price by country for the National Development
scenario (in €/MWh).
Figure 5-34. Average marginal price (€/MWh) in the Mediterranean countries
for the Inertial scenario (The stronger the colour, the higher the marginal price)
As a result of the highest renewable energy generation share, and other relatively lowcost generation, Portugal, Spain, and France have the lowest marginal price among the
Mediterranean countries (around €48 /MWh), followed by Morocco €53 /MWh).
Conversely, Syria, Lebanon, and Libya show, in this scenario, the highest marginal price
(in the range of €87-€92 /MWh) in the region, which can be explained by a tight supplydemand balance and by significant electricity generation from oil.
Türkiye also shows one of the highest marginal prices (€83 /MWh), which results on
one hand from a relatively inefficient thermal generation fleet, and on the other, from
a low import capacity, which limits opportunities on its Western border for importing
electricity at a lower price.
The same observations can be made in the other 2030 scenarios,
Figure 5-35 shows the
marginal price in the Green Development scenario.
Figure 5-35. Anual average marginal price (€/Mw) by country for the Proactive scenario
(The stronger the colour, the higher the marginal price)
In the PR scenario and with the ambitious efforts to develop more RES, marginal prices
decrease in all countries.
Figure 5-36. Anual average marginal price (€/Mw) by country for the Mediterranean Ambition
scenario (The stronger the colour, the higher the marginal price)
Figure 5-36 shows the MA scenario and efforts towards energy efficiency.
5.5 National balance
Combined with marginal prices, the examination of the national balance for each country
is of interest in the study of the Masterplan to anticipate the opportunities for the
development of interconnections. The annual balance can be expressed either as a gross
value (in TWh per year), or as a relative percentage of national electricity consumption.
Figure 5-37 shows the country balance versus the national load for different scenarios
and countries. We can observe the effect of different scenario configurations on the
countries for either importing or exporting situation.
As seen in
Figure 5-38 , , France is the highest exporter while Italy is the highest importer
in terms of TWh, and Spain becomes a net exporter in the PR & MA scenarios compared
to 2020. The strongest annual balances, whether in import or export, are observed
among the North-Western Mediterranean countries. France is the main exporting
country (between 82 and 96 TWh according to the scenario), while Italy is the main
importing country (between 32 and 35 TWh). Such levels are possible because of strongly
interconnected systems.
PREVIOUS CHAPTER
NEXT CHAPTER